User agent detail

Opera/7.10 (Linux 2.2.22 i686; U) [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeLinux 2.2.22closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 7.10Presto 1.0Linux Desktop0.019 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Opera 7.10closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 7.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 7.10closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 7.10Presto GNU/Linux desktop0.015 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 7.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 7.10closeLinux 2.2.22closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 7.10 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 7.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.072 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 7.10 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 7.10 Linux desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 7.10closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 7.10closeLinux 2.2.22 i686 Desktopcloseclose0.027 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 7.10closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:04:51 | by ThaDafinser