User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0(miniGUI/3.x; U; Linux i686; en; ) AppleWebKit/533.9.0 (KHTML, like Gecko) mDolphin/3.0.0 Safria/533.9.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
mDolphin 3.0.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 533.9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Dolphin 3.0.0closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0(miniGUI/3.x;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
mDolphin 3.0.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 533.9.0closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.09501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 533.9.0Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Dolphin 3.0.0Webkit 533.9.0Linux mobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:04:42 | by ThaDafinser