User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; en-id; samsung gt-c3303i) UCBrowser8.2.1.144/69/444/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close Samsunggt-c3303iclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBot/Crawler0.02 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesclose0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close SamsungChampmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 8.2 Samsunggt-c3303ismartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.1close Samsunggt-c3303icloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 8.2.1.144 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 8.2Gecko Touchwiz SamsungChampmobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close UCWebUCBrowserFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 8.2.1.144close Samsungc3303icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:04:37 | by ThaDafinser