User agent detail

iBrowser/Mini2.5 (SAMSUNG-GT-S5753E/S5753EDDKF1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungGT-S5753Eclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
iBrowser 2.5WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.007 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
iBrowser 2.5close closecloseMobile Phoneyesyesclose0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
iBrowser Mini2.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IBrowse close SamsungWave 575desktop-browsercloseclose0.20201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
IBrowse SamsungGT-S5753Esmartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
iBrowser Mini 2.5close SamsungGT-S5753Ecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
iBrowser Mini 2.5 Bada SamsungWave 575mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
IBrowse rclose SamsungGT-S5753Ecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:04:34 | by ThaDafinser