User agent detail

XBMC/9.04-beta1 r19639 (Windows; Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2 build 2600; http://www.xbmc.org)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
XBMC 9.04 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
XBMC 9.04closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

XBMC 9.04-beta1closeWindows media-playercloseclose0.21101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
XBMC 9.04 Windows XPdesktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
XBMC 9.04 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows XPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:04:28 | by ThaDafinser