User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; Pt-br; samsung gt-s3100) UCBrowser8.3.0.154/69/444/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close Samsunggt-s3100closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBot/Crawler0.073 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesclose0.061 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close Samsunggt-s3100mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 8.3 Samsunggt-s3100smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.3.0close Samsunggt-s3100closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.93105 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 8.3.0.154 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39002 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 8.3Gecko Samsunggt-s3100mobile:featureyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close UCWebUCBrowserFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 8.3.0.154close Samsungs3100closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:04:24 | by ThaDafinser