User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; AIX 0048013C4C00; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021009 Netscape/7.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Netscape 7.0Gecko unknownAIX unknownunknowngeneral DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 7.0Gecko AIX Desktop0.053 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Netscape 7.0closeAIX closecloseDesktopclose0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Netscape 7.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Navigator 7.0closeAIX desktop-browsercloseclose0.20401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Netscape 7.0Gecko AIX 0048013desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Netscape Navigator 7.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 7.0close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Netscape 7.0Gecko 1.0.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Netscape 7.0closeAIX 0048013C4C00closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 7.0Gecko 20021009a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape 7.0Gecko 1.0.1AIX 0048013desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Netscape 7.0close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:04:12 | by ThaDafinser