User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; es-ES; rv:1.8.1.10) Gecko/20071116 K-Meleon/1.1.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
K-Meleon 1.1Gecko unknownWinME MEunknownWindows DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
K-Meleon 1.1Gecko WinME MEDesktop0.022 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.8.1.10closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

K-Meleon 1.1.3closeWindows 4.90desktop-browsercloseclose0.21101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
K-meleon 1.1Gecko Windows MEdesktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.8close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
K-Meleon 1.1.3closeWindows ME closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.8.1.10closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

K-Meleon 1.1.3closeWindows Me closecloseclosecloseclose0.07801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

K-Meleon 1.1.3Gecko 20071116Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
K-Meleon 1.1.3Gecko 1.8.1Windows MEdesktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
K-Meleon 1.1.3closeWindows Mecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:04:10 | by ThaDafinser