User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (en-us) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; Google PP Default) Chrome/27.0.1453 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
Chrome 27.0WebKit unknownunknown unknownunknowngeneral DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Chrome 27.0WebKit Desktop0.08401 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Chrome 27.0close closecloseDesktopclose0.053 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Chrome 27.0.1453closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Chrome 27.0.1453close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Chrome 27.0.1453close desktop-browsercloseclose0.21401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Chrome 27.0WebKit 0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Chrome 27.0.1453close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 27.0.1453close closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Chrome 27.0.1453close closecloseclosecloseclose0.075 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Chrome 27.0.1453WebKit 537.36 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Chrome 27Blink desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1453closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Chrome 27.0.1453close Desktopcloseclose0.021 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Google Chrome 27.0.1453close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:04:05 | by ThaDafinser