User agent detail

LG-GB210 Teleca
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGGB210closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG-GB210 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo close LGGB210mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo LGGB210smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close LGGB210closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Teleca-Obigo close closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

LGLGGB210closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo LGGB210mobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close LGGB210Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Teleca close LGGB210closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:04:03 | by ThaDafinser