User agent detail

Opera/4.0 (Windows 98;US) [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 4.0 Windows 98desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera Win98 98Desktop0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 4.0closeWindows 98desktop-browsercloseclose0.20501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 4.0Presto Windows 98desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 4.0closeWindows 98closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 4.0closeWindows 98 closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 4.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 4.0closeWindows 98 closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 4.0 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 4.0 Windows 98desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 4.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 4.0closeWindows 98 Desktopcloseclose0.018 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 4.0closeWindows 98closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:04:02 | by ThaDafinser