User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S5630C_CMCC/1.0 RTK-E/1.0 SHP/VPP/R5 Release/17.08.2008 Browser/NetFront3.5 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.0 configura
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungGT-S5630Cclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SAMSUNG-GT-S5630C closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront 3.5closeJVM SamsungGT-S5630Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
NetFront NetFront SamsungGT-S5630Csmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungGT-S5630Ccloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Netfront Browser 3.5 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

NetFront 3.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

NetFront Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.27002 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NetFront 3.5 SamsungGT-S5630Cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close SamsungGT-S5630CFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
NetFront 3.5close SamsungGT-S5630Ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:59 | by ThaDafinser