User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041220 K-Meleon/0.9
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
K-Meleon 0.9Gecko unknownWinME MEunknownWindows DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
K-Meleon 0.9Gecko WinME MEDesktop0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.7.5closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

K-Meleon 0.9closeWindows 4.90desktop-browsercloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
K-meleon 0.9Gecko Windows MEdesktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.7close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
K-Meleon 0.9closeWindows ME closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.7.5closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

K-Meleon 0.9closeWindows Me closecloseclosecloseclose0.073 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

K-Meleon 0.9Gecko 20041220Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
K-Meleon 0.9Gecko 1.7.5Windows MEdesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
K-Meleon 0.9closeWindows Mecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:58 | by ThaDafinser