User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; Id; lg-gt365) UCBrowser8.4.0.159/70/352/UCWEB Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGgt365closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBot/Crawler0.045 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesclose0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.005 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close LGgt365mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 8.4 LGgt365smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.4.0close LGgt365closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose1.15306 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.12901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 8.4.0.159 LGLGgt365closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 8.4Gecko LGgt365mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close UCWebUCBrowserFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 8.4.0.159close LGgt365closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:57 | by ThaDafinser