User agent detail

Links4US-Crawler, ( http://links4us.com/)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
US-Crawler close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesLinks4US-CrawlerBot/Crawler0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesLinks4US-Crawlerclose0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Links4US-Crawler closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesUS-Crawlerclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Links 4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Links closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
No result found
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Links close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:55 | by ThaDafinser