User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.452) Gecko/20041027 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.452closeWindows 5.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:1.452closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.20501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Windows XPdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.4closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.452closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla 1.452closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.07 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 1.452Gecko 20041027Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Gecko 1.452Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows XPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:54 | by ThaDafinser