User agent detail

?ua=SAMSUNG-GT-S3350/1.0 NetFront/3.4 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungGT-S3350closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
NetFront 3.4NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
NetFront 3.4close closecloseMobile Deviceyesclose0.005 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront 3.4closeJVM AccessNetFront Ver. 3.4mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
NetFront 3.4NetFront SamsungGT-S3350smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.4close SamsungGT-S3350closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Netfront Browser 3.4 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

NetFront 3.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

NetFront Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NetFront 3.4 SamsungCh@t 335mobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
NetFront 3.4close AccessNetFront Ver. 3.4Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
NetFront 3.4close SamsungGT-S3350closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:52 | by ThaDafinser