User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 8.12; MSIEMobile 6.5) Motorola_ES405B_312
Additional headers
UA-OS Windows CE (Pocket PC) - Version 5.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Mobile 6.5ES405 Enterprise Smartphonemobile:smartclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
IEMobile 8.12Trident 3.1WinCE Mobile Phoneyes0.029 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
IE 6.0closeWin32 closecloseDesktopcloseclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
BrowscapPhp
6014
IE 6.0closeWin32 closecloseDesktopclose0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
IEMobile 8.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 8.12closeWindowsMobileOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IE Mobile 8.12closeWindows MotorolaES405Bmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
IE Mobile 8.12Trident Windows CE MotorolaES405Bsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 8.12closeWindows CE closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Internet Explorer 6.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.13601 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

IE Mobile 8.12closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.06901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer Mobile Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44004 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Mobile 6.5MotorolaES405 Enterprise Smartphonemobile:smartyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile MotorolaES405BFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.05701 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
IEMobile 8.12closeWindows CEcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-17 06:37:41 | by ThaDafinser