User agent detail

Safari5530.17 CFNetwork/438.12 Darwin/9.7.0 (i386) (Macmini2,1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeMac OS X 10.5.7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
CFNetwork WebKit MacOSX 10.5AppleMacintoshDesktop0.02 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
CFNetwork closeDarwin closecloseDesktopclose0.039 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari5530 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari closeOS X 10.5.7desktop-browsercloseclose0.22001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Mac 10.5desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 438.12closeMac OS X 10.5.7AppleMacmini2,1closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeDarwin closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Safari Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Safari Mac OS X 10.5.7desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
CFNetwork App 3.1closeMac OS X 10.5Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari closeMac OS Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:46 | by ThaDafinser