User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SCH-B309I/B309IGC14;U;REX/3.0;BREW/3.1.5;128*128) Ucweb/6.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/os-brew.yaml
UC Browser 6.3Gecko Brew 3.1.5SCH-B309mobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeBREWOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close SamsungSCH-B309mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 6.3 Brew 3.1SamsungSCH-B309Ismartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeBREW 3.1.5closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser 6.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.11301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 6.3 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 6.3Gecko Brew 3.1.5SamsungSCH-B309mobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 6.3close SamsungB309Icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:46 | by ThaDafinser