User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Yahoo-Test/4.0 ysm-keystone-crawl-support@yahoo-inc.com)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
ysm-keystone-crawl close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesYahoo-TestBot/Crawler0.045 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesYahoo-Testclose0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closecloseclosecloseyesYahooclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesysm-keystone-crawlclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseclosecloseyesYahooclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
No result found
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
close Samsungkeystone-crawl-supportcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:44 | by ThaDafinser