User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (BeOS; U; BeOS BePC; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060702 SeaMonkey/1.5a
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
SeaMonkey 1.5acloseBeOS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.9a1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

SeaMonkey 1.5acloseBeOS desktop-browsercloseclose0.19801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SeaMonkey 1.5Gecko BeOS desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
SeaMonkey 1.5acloseBeOS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 1.5close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.9closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

SeaMonkey 1.5acloseBeOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.08001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Seamonkey 1.5aGecko 20060702BeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SeaMonkey 1.5Gecko 1.9a1BeOS desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
SeaMonkey 1.5acloseBeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:42 | by ThaDafinser