User agent detail

Netvibes (http://www.netvibes.com)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/bots.yml
closecloseyesNetvibesFeed Fetcher0 Detail
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesNetvibesRSS0.004 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesNetvibesclose0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Netvibes closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

Netvibes feed reader close feed-readercloseclose0.22001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesNetvibesFeed Fetcher0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesNetvibesclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesNetvibesclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:41 | by ThaDafinser