User agent detail

DoCoMo/2.0 F02C (c500; TB; W24H16)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close DoCoMoF02Cclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/carrier-docomo.yaml
F02Cmobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
DoCoMo 2.0 JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
DoCoMo 2.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Deviceyesclose0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
DoCoMo 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

NetFront close DoCoMomobile-browseryescloseclose0.20301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
DoCoMoF02Cfeature phoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close DoCoMoF02Ccloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

F02C closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
FujitsuF02Cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo F02Ccloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close DoCoMoFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
DoCoMo 2.0close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:40 | by ThaDafinser