User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) KHTML/4.8.5 (like Gecko) Mageia Konqueror/4.8
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Konqueror 4.8KHTML GNU/Linux desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Konqueror 4.8closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Konqueror 4.8KHTML GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Konqueror 4.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.8closeMageia closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0KHTML 4.8.5closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Konqueror 4.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.10801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Konqueror 4.8 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Konqueror 4.8KHTML 4.8.5Mageia desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Konqueror 4.8closeMageia closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:39 | by ThaDafinser