User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Linux; Socialradarbot/2.0; en-US; bot@infegy.com)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
yesSocialradar BotBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesSocialradar BotBot/Crawler0.034 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesSocialradar Botclose0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.001 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesSocialradarbotclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15601 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:37 | by ThaDafinser