User agent detail

Mozilla/4.79 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.10 i86pc)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Solaris 5.10desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 4.79Gecko SunOS Desktop0.01 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Netscape 4.79closeSunOS closecloseDesktopclose0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Communicator 4.7.9closeSolaris 10desktop-browsercloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Solaris 5.10desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 4.79closeSunOS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeSolaris closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 4.79 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 4.79 SunOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape Communicator 4.7.9 Solaris 10desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeSolaris closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:36 | by ThaDafinser