User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; TweetmemeBot/3.0; +http://tweetmeme.com/)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
yesTweetmeme BotBot/Crawler0 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/bots.yml
closecloseyesTweetmeme BotCrawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesTweetmeme BotBot/Crawler0.034 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesTweetmeme Botclose0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closecloseclosecloseyesTweetmemeBotclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesclose0.20601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesTweetmeme BotCrawler0.001 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesTweetmemeBotclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

TweetMeme Bot 3.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:33 | by ThaDafinser