User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-I8350/UCWEB2.0.0.149/47/32079
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungGT-I8350closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SAMSUNG-GT-I8350 UCWEB2.0.0.149closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
UCBrowser close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close SamsungGT-I8350mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 2.0 SamsungGT-I8350smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 2.0.0close SamsungGT-I8350closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser 2.0.0.149close closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 2.0.0.149 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 2.0Gecko SamsungGT-I8350mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 2.0.0.149close SamsungGT-I8350closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:32 | by ThaDafinser