User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux 3.8.13-gentoo x86_64; xx) KHTML/4.10.5 (like Gecko) Konqueror/4.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Konqueror 4.10KHTML 4.10.5Linux desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Konqueror 4.10KHTML 4.10Linux Desktop0.033 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Konqueror 4.10closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Konqueror 4.10closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Konqueror 4.10KHTML GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Konqueror 4.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.10closeGentoo 3.8.13closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0KHTML 4.10.5closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.17701 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Konqueror 4.10close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Konqueror 4.10 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.34502 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Konqueror 4.10KHTML 4.10.5Linux desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Konqueror 4.10closeGentoo closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:30 | by ThaDafinser