User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; OSF1 alpha; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020517 Netscape6/6.2.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Netscape 6.2Gecko unknownTru64 UNIX unknownunknowngeneral DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 6.2Gecko Tru64 UNIX Desktop0.058 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Netscape 6.2closeTru64 UNIX closecloseDesktopclose0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Netscape close closecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Navigator 6.2.3close desktop-browsercloseclose0.20101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Netscape 6.2Gecko OSF1 desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Netscape Navigator 6.2.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 6.2.3close closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Netscape 6Gecko 0.9.4.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Netscape 6.2.3closeOSF/1 closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 6.2.3Gecko 20020517a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape 6.2.3Gecko 0.9.4Digital Unix desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Netscape 6close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:28 | by ThaDafinser