User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux 2.4.20-gentoo-r5 i686; U) Opera 7.11 [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeGentoo 2.4.20closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 7.11Presto 1.0Linux Desktop0.02 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Opera 7.11closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 7.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera 7.11closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 7.11closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 7.11Presto GNU/Linux desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 7.11closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 7.11closeGentoo 2.4.20closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 7.11 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 7.11close closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 7.11 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 7.11 Linux desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 7.11closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 7.11closeGentoo closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:28 | by ThaDafinser