User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Tizen 2.0; xx) AppleWebKit/537.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/2.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/os-tizen.yaml
Samsung Browser Webkit 537.1Tizen 2.0mobile:smartclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mobile Safari closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Tizen 2.0yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 537.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15501 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

5.0WebKit 537.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.26101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Samsung Browser Webkit 537.1Tizen 2.0mobile:smartyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux TizenFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeTizen closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:26 | by ThaDafinser