User agent detail

HTC_Touch_HD_T8282
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close HTCTouch_HD_T8282closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Windows Mobile Touch HDmobile:smartclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
HTC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeWindows Mobile HTCTouch HDmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
HTCTouch HD T8282smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close HTCTouch_HD_T8282closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Windows Mobile HTCTouch HDmobile:smartyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close HTCTouch HD T8282Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
close HTCTouchcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:26 | by ThaDafinser