User agent detail

SAMSUNG-ANDROID-MMS/GT-N5100
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungGT-N5100closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SAMSUNG-ANDROID-MMS GTcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeAndroidOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close Samsungmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SamsungGALAXY Note 8.0"tabletyes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungGT-N5100closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15501 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Stock Android Browser Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Android Browser Android SamsungANDROID-MMSmobile:smartyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeAndroid SamsungANDROID-MMScloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:26 | by ThaDafinser