User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Opera/9.5) HTC Victor
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close HTCVictorclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
IE 7.0Trident Desktop0.007 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
IE 7.0close closecloseDesktopcloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
BrowscapPhp
6014
IE 7.0close closecloseDesktopclose0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 9.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IE 7.0close HTCVictordesktop-browsercloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 9.5Presto HTCVictorsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 9.5)close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.5close HTCVictorcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 9.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 9.5 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25002 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera Mobile 9.5 HTCVictormobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 9.5close HTCVictorcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:21 | by ThaDafinser