User agent detail

HUAWEI-G5520/1.0 MTK6252C/Nucleus 1.0 Release/05.21.2012 Browser/OBIGO-Q03C WAP-Browser 1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Config/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close HuaweiG5520closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.026 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Teleca-Obigo closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.056 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
HUAWEI-G5520 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
UCBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM HuaweiG5520mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo MTK / Nucleus 1.0HuaweiG5520smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 3close HuaweiG5520closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 03 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.14901 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 3C HuaweiG5520mobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo close Huaweicloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:20 | by ThaDafinser