User agent detail

ncamera/1.0.0 (Android OS 2.3.6;samsung SHV-E160L)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungSHV-E160Lclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
ncamera 1.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeAndroidOS OScloseclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Android Browser closeAndroid SamsungGalaxy Notemobile-browseryescloseclose0.28102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3SamsungSHV-E160Lsmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid SamsungSHV-E160Lcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Stock Android Browser Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Android Browser Android SamsungGalaxy Notemobile:smartyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Android close Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeAndroid SamsungE160Lcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:16 | by ThaDafinser