User agent detail

PANTECH-C820/R01 MOZILLA/40 UNTRUSTED/10 UPLINK/631170
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close PantechC820closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
PANTECH-C820 R01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close PantechC820mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
PantechC820smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 40close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close PantechC820closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 40 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
PantechC820mobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close PantechC820Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:13 | by ThaDafinser