User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DTV) AppleWebKit/531.2+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Espial/6.1.12 AQUOSBrowser/1.0 (AS00DTV;V;0001;0001)AQUOS-AS/2.0 LC-60LX959H
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/sharp.yaml
Espial 6.1.12Webkit 531.2 LX959Htelevisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 531.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Espial 6.1.12close media-playercloseclose0.20401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Espial TV Browser 6.1WebKit SharpLC-60LX959Htv0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Espial 6.1.12close closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.15901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 531.2 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Espial 6.1.12Webkit 531.2 SharpLX959H Aquos TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SharpAQUOS TV BrowserSmart-TVcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Espial 6.1.12close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:11 | by ThaDafinser