User agent detail

Alcatel-OT-806D/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ObigoInternetBrowser/Q05A
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close AlcatelOT-806Dclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Obigo Q 5.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.022 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Obigo Q 5.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.056 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Alcatel-OT-806D 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM AlcatelOT-806Dmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Q05A AlcatelOT-806Dsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo close AlcatelOT-806Dcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 05 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15601 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 5A AlcatelOne Touch 806Dmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose AlcatelOT-806DFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo InternetBrowserclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:10 | by ThaDafinser