User agent detail

OPR/22.0.1481.0 OMI/4.2.12.29, KreaTV/0.0.0.0 (ARRIS, IPC1100, wired)CM[00.01]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Opera 22.0.1481.0Blink ARRISIPC1100tvcloseclose0 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Devices 4.2 IPC1100televisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera Next 22.0.1481.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera Devices 4.2close media-playercloseclose0.19801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 22.0Blink ARRISIPC1100tv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 22.0.1481.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera Devices 4.2 ArrisIPC1100 KreaTVtelevisioncloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 22.0.1481.0close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:09 | by ThaDafinser