User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; xx; XT875) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/10.2.0.535 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 10.2Gecko Android Droid Bionicmobile:smartclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
UCBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close AISIris 800mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 10.2 MotorolaXT875smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 10.2.0close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 10.2.0.535 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 10.2Gecko Android MotorolaDroid Bionicmobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close UCWebUCBrowserFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 10.2.0.535close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:03:08 | by ThaDafinser