User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030516 Mozilla Firebird/0.6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Firefox 0.6Gecko 1.0Linux unknownunknownLinux DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Firefox 0.6Gecko 1.0Linux Desktop0.031 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Firefox 0.6closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.4bcloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Firebird (old name for Firefox) 0.6closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.22401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Firebird 0.6Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Firebird 0.6closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Firebird 0.6Gecko 1.4closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15801 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Firebird 0.6closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Firebird 0.6Gecko 20030516Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Firebird 0.6Gecko 1.4Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Firebird 0.6closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:58 | by ThaDafinser