User agent detail

msnbot/0.9 (+http://search.msn.com/msnbot.htm)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
yesmsnbotBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesmsnbotBot/Crawler0.01 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesmsnbotclose0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
msnbot 0.9closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closecloseclosecloseyesMSNBotclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesBingclose0.20401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesBingBotSearch bot0.001 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesmsnbotclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseclosecloseyesMSNBotclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesmsnbotCrawler0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

MSN Bot 0.9 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesBingclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesmsnbotclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:58 | by ThaDafinser