User agent detail

LG-CP150/V09e Teleca/WAP2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGCP150closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.018 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Teleca-Obigo closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.049 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG-CP150 V09ecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo WAP 2.0close LGCP150mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo LGCP150smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close LGCP150closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Teleca-Obigo close closecloseclosecloseclose0.069 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

LGLGCP150closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo WAP 2.0 LGCP150mobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close LGCP150Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Teleca WAP2.0close LGCP150closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:56 | by ThaDafinser