User agent detail

MOT-V525M/0B.09.1DR MIB/2.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close MotorolaV525Mclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2 MotorolaV525MMobile Phoneyes0.006 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MOT-V525M 0B.09.1DRcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Motorola Internet Browser 2.2close MotorolaV525Mmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
MotorolaV525Msmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaV525Mcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.17001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

MIB 2.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera Mini MotorolaMotorola V525Mcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.22901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2 MotorolaV525Mmobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close MotorolaV525MFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.029 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
MIB 2.2close MotorolaV525Mcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:46 | by ThaDafinser