User agent detail

Liferea/1.10-RC1 (Linux; en_GB.UTF-8; http://liferea.sf.net/)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/feed_reader.yml
Liferea 1.10 GNU/Linux desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesLifereaRSS0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesLifereaclose0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Liferea 1.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Liferea 1.10closeLinux feed-readercloseclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Liferea 1.10 GNU/Linux desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.16901 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Liferea 1.10 Linux closeclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:43 | by ThaDafinser