User agent detail

Links (0.99pre4; Linux 2.4.18-26.7.x i686; 119x44)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeLinux 2.4.18closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Links 0.9 Linux Desktop0.012 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Links 0.9closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Links closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Links 0.99pre4closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Links 0.99Text-based GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Links 0.99closeLinux 2.4.18closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Links 0.99 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.16701 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Links 0.99pre4closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.10201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Links 0.99pre4 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Links 0.99 Linux closeclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Links 0.99pre4closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:40 | by ThaDafinser