User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 8.12; MSIEMobile 6.0) acer_F900
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
IE Mobile 8.12Trident Windows CE AcerF900smartphonecloseclose0 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Mobile 6.5Tempo F900mobile:smartclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
IEMobile 8.12Trident 3.1WinCE Mobile Phoneyes0.012 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
IE 6.0closeWin32 closecloseDesktopcloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
BrowscapPhp
6014
IE 6.0closeWin32 closecloseDesktopclose0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
IEMobile 8.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 8.12closeWindowsMobileOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IE Mobile 8.12closeWindows AcerAcer F900mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
IE Mobile 8.12Trident Windows CE AcerF900smartphoneyes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 8.12closeWindows CE closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Internet Explorer 6.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.16801 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

IE Mobile 8.12closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer Mobile Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Mobile 6.5AcerTempo F900mobile:smartyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile AcerF900Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
IEMobile 8.12closeWindows CEcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:02:32 | by ThaDafinser